Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)

Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)
Formerly Nintex RPA LE

Overview

What is Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)?

Nintex RPA LE, which was based on Foxtrot powered by Enablesoft, was a suite of robotic process automation (RPA) software solutions. Foxtrot is now discontinued.

Read more
Recent Reviews

Good Record Updater

9 out of 10
March 10, 2020
We use Nintex RPA is used for scraping and record updating on applications that do not have mass update features.
Continue reading
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Nintex RPA Standard

$85.00

Cloud
per month

Nintex RPA Enterprise (includes Workflow)

$135.00

Cloud
per month

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.nintex.com/pricing/#rpa

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Starting price (does not include set up fee)

  • $85 per month
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Foxtrot RPA (discontinued)?

Nintex RPA LE, formerly Foxtrot by EnableSoft, gives enterprises trained bots to automate routine tasks without the use of code in a drag and drop interface, an enterprise-grade process management and automation solution.


Nintex suggests Foxtrot / Nintext RPA LE users upgrade to Nintex RPA.

Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) Video

Robotic process automation (RPA) helps your employees do more with less.

Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) Competitors

Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Nintex RPA LE, which was based on Foxtrot powered by Enablesoft, was a suite of robotic process automation (RPA) software solutions. Foxtrot is now discontinued.

Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) starts at $85.

Automation Anywhere, UiPath Automation Platform, and SS&C Blue Prism Intelligent Automation are common alternatives for Foxtrot RPA (discontinued).

The most common users of Foxtrot RPA (discontinued) are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(6)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-1 of 1)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
April 02, 2019

My review of Foxtrot RPA

Verified User
Vice-President in Other
Financial Services Company, 501-1000 employees
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Foxtrot is currently being used at the organization level. It is a fantastic tool in serving as a force multiplier. It allows us to efficiently perform mass maintenance operations within a few hours. The best part is that it does so by mimicking the data input of an actual person, so no backend coding or programming is required and neither is the support of IT. In addition, it allows for the natural audit logs and monitoring of applications to still pick up any operations done by the tool organically.
We utilize it in addition for remote process automation tasks. We have been able to phase out several manual processes and schedule automated script tasks, which can perform the operations much quicker and with virtually no errors.
Pros and Cons
  • Automating repetitive data input tasks.
  • Allows for the development of quick solutions without the need for IT.
  • Provide robust functionality for the automation of manual tasks.
  • It could use better handling of emulator response times and states. For example, oftentimes the tool moves faster than the emulator can perform tasks and the whole process can crash, forcing the user to start over.
  • It could use a drag and drop workflow interface, which might make it easier to create complex scripts.
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for the automation of repetitive data input tasks and manual entries. It is also well suited for developing solutions to speed up and automate ad-hoc mass maintenance tasks. It is not well suited for situations where workflows or approvals are needed, and it is also not ideal when supervision of the application needs to be constant.
Return on Investment
  • As previously mentioned, Foxtrot has allowed us to become infinitely more efficient in handling mass maintenance scenarios within the organization. It has allowed us to go from development to deployment often within a couple of days including testing.
  • It has further allowed for the remote automation of manual tasks performed on a daily basis and freed up that time so that the resources can be more efficient within their functions and get more things done.
  • The tool has allowed for the creation of several template scripts that can be utilized anytime for similar situations, which has made us even more efficient in that the development of the script only happens one time and provides for infinite uses without any additional overhead.
Alternatives Considered
Foxtrot does not have nearly as much in terms of functionality and workflow tools. It is primarily meant for automating and creating scripts that help with mainframe-based maintenance and migration tasks. In addition, it is very efficient in simulating the actions of an individual for daily and manual tasks. We selected Foxtrot because it was the tool that was recommended by the main vendor we needed to interface with, and industry-wide it was the main tool being used by other financial institutions with similar platforms to perform the tasks that we bought the platform to perform.
Return to navigation